Solving Inequality Problem: 0<|z|<1 and z_1, z_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garret122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequalities for complex numbers z_1 and z_2 given the condition 0 < |z| < 1. It is established that |z_1| > 1 using the triangle inequality, as |1/a| is greater than 1. The challenge lies in demonstrating that |z_2| < 1, with participants noting that the signs of the terms in the equations for z_1 and z_2 affect the outcome. Clarification is sought regarding the variable 'a', with suggestions that 0 < |a| < 1 may be the intended condition. The conversation emphasizes the need for a rigorous proof to aid in an integral problem in complex analysis.
Garret122
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi this is my problem:

if 0<|z|<1 and z_1 = -1/a - ((1-a^2)^(1/2))/a
z_2 = -1/a + ((1-a^2)^(1/2))/a
Then it is clear to me that |z_1|>1 since using triangle inequality we get that |z_1| =| -1/a - ((1-a^2)^(1/2))/a | >= |1/a| + something smaller than one but positiv, and since |1/a| >1 then |z_1| > 1

But how to prove |z_2| < 1 since bye triangle inequality we kind of get the same thing |z_2| = | -1/a + ((1-a^2)^(1/2))/a | >= |1/a|+ |((1-a^2)^(1/2))/a| > 1 ? This doesn't make sense at all!

Please help me, i need this to a problem on an integral in complex analysis, which I'm preparing for my exam ;)

thank you for your time!
Garret
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, what is a?
 
I suppose that the first equation should be 0 <|a|<1.
The second term of the equations for z_1 and z_2 has the same sign as \frac{1}{a}.
When both terms have the minus sign, you are adding the moduli and clearly the modulus of the result is greater than 1.When the first is negative and the second positive you subtract the moduli. It remains to show that the modulus of the result is smaller than 1.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Back
Top