Inequality X^n<Y^n if x<y and n is odd

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karim Habashy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Karim Habashy
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

Question : Prove that xn<yn , given that x<y and n is odd .

Attempt at solution :
Assumptions:
y-x>0
y2>0
x2>0

So y2x<y3 & x3<x2y

So i need to prove that x2y<y2x

i.e need to prove

then y2x-x2y>0

then yx(y-x)>0, from assumptions y-x>0 so i need to prove that yx>0, so i have 3 cases

Case 1 : y and x are both positive so the inequality is true and everything is true.
Case 2: y and x are both negative so the inequality is true again and everything is true
Case 3 : y is positive and x is negative (as y>x), then the above inequality is not true, but i go back knowing that y is positive and x is negative, then y>0 and x<0 so y3>0 and x3<0 so y3>x3

At the end x3<y3 and by repetition xn <yn

End.

Is this proof true ? is there an easier way.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There may be an easier way, by considering 3 cases.
1. both positive. y^n-x^n=(y-x)(x^{n-1}+yx^{n-2}+...y^{n-1}) \gt 0 Since y-x > 0 and series has all positive terms.
2. y >0 and x < 0. Odd powers have same sign.
3. both negative. Change sign for both and use case 1 to show -x^n \gt -y^n.
 
Alternatively, show that f(x) = x2k+1 for all natural numbers k is strictly monotonically increasing.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top