Inertial Frame of Reference: Why Space Selects a Non-Inertial Frame

mark_gg
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Why does one particular 'frame of reference' have fictitious forces (like inertia) whilst another one doesn't.

I understand the basics, but more interested in 'why' space seems to have magically chosen specific frame to be the 'non inertial frame'.

Could space be more absolute than we think it is?

Has any research been done in this problem, which is at odds with a truly relativistic space (although I'm not saying relativity is wrong)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nature doesn't "magically" choose the inertial and non-inertial frames or the inertial and non-inertial trajectories; such things are determined entirely by the space-time geometry i.e. by gravity.
 
Spacetime has properties--its geometry. The geometry of spacetime gives no preference to specific locations or times or directions or reference frames. But it does determine certain things:

(1) The invariant interval between two close-by events.
(2) Which spatial lines are "straight".
(3) Which spacetime paths are inertial.

In the usual treatment of Special Relativity and General Relativity, all of these features are derived from a geometric field called the metric tensor. The metric tensor doesn't determine a preferred state of rest, and it doesn't determine a preferred direction in space, but it does determine which paths are inertial and which lines are "straight".

In the geometric view of spacetime, a path being inertial is exactly analogous to a line being straight.
 
mark_gg said:
I understand the basics, but more interested in 'why' space seems to have magically chosen specific frame to be the 'non inertial frame'.
There is nothing magical about it. The reference frame is a matter of choice. If you choose a curved reference frame then you get non-zero Christoffel symbols.

As an analogy, if you have a blank piece of paper, no coordinates, you still have straight lines and curved lines. If you then base your coordinates off the curved lines you would have "coordinate acceleration" of straight lines.

Do you think it is magical that both straight and curved lines exist? Do you think it is magical that they can be distinguished from each other?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top