Inertial & non-inertial frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Inertial
AI Thread Summary
Inertial reference frames are defined as those free from external forces, where Newton's laws of motion apply. Non-inertial reference frames experience acceleration and are influenced by fictitious forces, such as the Coriolis force. The discussion clarifies that inertial frames are not restricted to Euclidean space, as they can exist in various geometrical contexts. The distinction between these frames is crucial for understanding dynamics and motion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the fundamental differences in how forces and motion are perceived in inertial versus non-inertial frames.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Could someone explain me in detail the differences between an inertial reference frame and a non-inertial reference frame? Are inertial frames restricted to Euclidean space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inertial reference frame is a reference frame free of all external forces and non-inertial reference frame is the just the opposite.
 
inertial frame is the one where Newton's laws r applicable.and u can guess by this non inertial frames.if any frame having accelaration it does fall under non inertial frame where coriolis force come into play
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top