Infinite cylinder covered by one chart

  • Thread starter Thread starter beans73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Infinite
beans73
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I have just been doing some reading on manifolds, and I'm finding some of it hard to grasp. An example we were given was of the infinite cylinder and how to construct its map, and that it would be with one chart. the reading initially says that we can use θ \in (0,2pi] and z \in (-\infty, +\infty). It goes on to give two examples of maps that can be used:

1. ρ=tan^{-1}(z) + pi \in (pi/2, 3*pi/2)
2. ρ=e^{z} \in (0,\infty)

I was wondering if anyone could help me understand a little more of what's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is ρ?
 
the following attachments are the working out I'm talking about...
 

Attachments

  • manifold1.jpg
    manifold1.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 1,058
  • manifold2.jpg
    manifold2.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 1,029
I could not understand some words (I am very bad at reading anything hand written - even if written by myself!) but I think I understand that in the first case, the cylinder is paramaterized via a map from an annulus (ring), in another from a plane without the unit circle at the origin. What difficulty are you having with that?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top