The webpage title could be: Solving for x in an Infinite Geometric Series

AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation x + x^2 + x^3 + x^4... = 14, the formula for an infinite geometric series is applied. The series converges to 1/(1-x) when |x| < 1, allowing for the simplification of the expression. By factoring out x, the equation can be rewritten as 15x = 14, leading to the solution x = 14/15. This demonstrates the relationship between the series and its convergence criteria. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar problems involving infinite geometric series.
Niaboc67
Messages
249
Reaction score
3
x+x^2+x^3+x^4... = 14

Find x

Could someone please provide an explanation.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1 + x + x^2 +x^3 + ... = 1/(1-x) for |x| < 1
 
Could you explain why is it 1/(x-1) and for the abs x <1. I don't understand the reason for these and geometric series.
Thanks
 
1 + x + x^2 + ... + x^(n-1) = (1 - x^n)/(1-x)

This expression is valid for all x not equal to 1. Now let n go to infinity. The right side converges to 1/(1-x) if and only if abs(x) < 1 since x^n will goes to 0 for x in the interval (-1,1) and will diverge for x <= -1 or x > 1
 
A simpler way, I think: x+ x^2+ x^3+ ...= 14.
Factor out an x: x(1+ x+ x^2+ x^3+ ...)= x(1+ (x+ x^2+ x^3+ ...))= x(1+ 14)= 15x= 14 so x= 14/15.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top