Infinite or Finite: Examining Line Segments

cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
If you were to describe a line segment as the set where all of its infinite points were individual elements within the set than wouldn't the overall set which is the line segment also be considered infinite and not finite.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cam875 said:
If you were to describe a line segment as the set where all of its infinite points were individual elements within the set than wouldn't the overall set which is the line segment also be considered infinite and not finite.
Yes, as a set containing an "infinite" number of points, it is an infinite set. But that has nothing to do with its length if you were thinking of that as being finite.
 
so its geometrical length is still considered finite although its set is considered infinite?
 
cam875 said:
so its geometrical length is still considered finite although its set is considered infinite?

Length is a specific kind of measure on a set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics )

This is distinct from the cardinality of the set. The cardinality of informally referred to as the "size" of the set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top