Infinite series by integration by parts

disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
Hi, I wonder if this hypothesis is true:

Let f_n be an arbitrarily chosen n'th anti-derivative of the function f_0. Similarly, let g_n be the n'th derivative of the function g_0.

Now, \int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0]^b_a-\int^b_a f_1g_1 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0-f_2g_1+...]^b_a+(-1)^n \int^b_a f_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x.

hypothesis:

If \lim_{n \to \infty} f_{n+1}g_n =0 for all continuous intervals of and never diverges. Then

\int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n f_{n+1}g_n]^b_a

This seems intuitively correct, but I wonder how to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking Mean Value Theorem. The integral equals \epsilon(b-a)(f_{n+1}g_n)|_{x=c} for some c in the interval [a, b] and 0 \leq \epsilon \leq 1 which approaches zero.
 
this was double post, sorry
 
Last edited:
Excellent, thank you.

We have by induction that

\int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(-1)^n\int^b_af_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x=[\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(b-a)(f_{n+1} \circ g_n)(t)

For some t \in [a,b], and any non-negative integer n.

However, \lim_{n \to \infty} (f_{n+1} \circ g_{n} )(t)=0 is given, so

\int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x = \lim_{n \to \infty} \int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x= \lim_{n \to \infty} [\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(-1)^n\int^b_af_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x=\lim_{n \to \infty}[\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(b-a)(f_{n+1} \circ g_n)(t)=[\sum^{\infty}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a

But this is not so obvious if \lim_{n \to \infty} (f_{n+1} \circ g_{n} )(t) not always equal 0 i.e. is finite for discrete values of x, or if either of the limits are infinite. Can someone help me there?

Perhaps if the limits are infinite, we can let n tend towards infinity at a rate which make f_{n+1}g_n dominate a limit, say b i.e. so \lim_{b,n \to \infty} b \cdot f_{n+1}g_n = 0 Can we choose it to be like that?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top