- 1,864
- 34
Hi, I wonder if this hypothesis is true:
Let f_n be an arbitrarily chosen n'th anti-derivative of the function f_0. Similarly, let g_n be the n'th derivative of the function g_0.
Now, \int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0]^b_a-\int^b_a f_1g_1 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0-f_2g_1+...]^b_a+(-1)^n \int^b_a f_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x.
hypothesis:
If \lim_{n \to \infty} f_{n+1}g_n =0 for all continuous intervals of and never diverges. Then
\int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n f_{n+1}g_n]^b_a
This seems intuitively correct, but I wonder how to prove it.
Let f_n be an arbitrarily chosen n'th anti-derivative of the function f_0. Similarly, let g_n be the n'th derivative of the function g_0.
Now, \int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0]^b_a-\int^b_a f_1g_1 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0-f_2g_1+...]^b_a+(-1)^n \int^b_a f_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x.
hypothesis:
If \lim_{n \to \infty} f_{n+1}g_n =0 for all continuous intervals of and never diverges. Then
\int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n f_{n+1}g_n]^b_a
This seems intuitively correct, but I wonder how to prove it.
Last edited: