Inflammable material carrying vehicles

  • Thread starter Thread starter phymathlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material Vehicles
AI Thread Summary
Special rubber tires on aircraft are designed to be slightly conductive to dissipate static electricity generated by friction, preventing sparks that could ignite fires. Similarly, vehicles transporting flammable materials often use metallic ropes to ground themselves while in motion. The discussion highlights that sparks occur when an electrostatic field becomes strong enough to cause air breakdown. Providing a conductive path, such as drag chains or conductive tires, helps drain these charges, enhancing safety during refueling. Overall, these measures are crucial for reducing fire risks associated with static electricity.
phymathlover
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Special rubber tires are made slightly conducting, in aircrafts, to enable them to pass on charge (produced by friction) to the ground, as too much charge may result in a spark and hence cause a fire. This is apparently the same reason why some vehicles usually have metallic ropes touching the ground during motion especially when they carry inflammable materials. But I don't get how exactly the charge causes the spark.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sparks are what you see when there is an air breakdown due to the strength of the electrostatic field (volts/meter) between two objects.

Providing a conductive path (drag chains, conductive tires, etc) allows the electrostatic charges to be drained ... thus the vehicle should not build up a static charge strong enough to spark. This makes it safer when refueling.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top