Influence of Orbitals on the mass of the electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electron orbitals and mass, questioning whether differing energy levels, like those of 2s and 3d orbitals, affect electron mass according to E=mc^2. It clarifies that while the mass of an atom can differ from the sum of its free subatomic particles, the mass of the electron itself remains constant. The mass difference in atoms, such as hydrogen, is attributed to the energy released when particles combine, not to changes in individual particle masses. It emphasizes that the masses of subatomic particles cannot be determined while they are bound in an atom. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of mass in atomic structures and the importance of energy interactions.
Uzbar Zibil Tarag
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If Energy levels differ in accordance to the orbital, say like 2s and 3d orbitals, then shouldn't the mass of the electron then change to uphold E=mc^2?
Or is there something I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in that the mass changes, but it isn't the mass of the electron that changes, it's the mass of the atom as a whole. In other words, an atom of hydrogen has slightly less mass than the sum of the masses of a free proton and free electron. This mass difference is proportional to the energy emitted when the electron and proton combine, with the exact amount found by using e=mc2.
 
While that does make sense, if the mass of the atom as a whole changes and the electrons don't change mass, then do the Neutrons or Proton, or in the case of the Hydrogen example, just the proton change mass to account for this change?
 
As far as I understand it, you can't say anything about the masses of each subatomic particle while they're bound in an atom. You can only say that the atom as a whole has less mass than the sum of the masses of the free particles. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable on this topic can explain it better than I can.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
933
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Back
Top