Infrastructure Life Expectancy: Frequency Distribution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing a costing model for water storage tanks, specifically addressing the challenge of estimating their life expectancy due to limited empirical data. Manufacturers have provided life expectancy estimates ranging from 25 to 50 years. The user seeks assistance in creating a Monte Carlo simulation and translating the provided data into a frequency distribution. Suggestions include calculating the mean and standard deviation for the estimates, but concerns arise regarding the validity of assumptions due to the small sample size. The conversation highlights the need for statistical expertise to navigate these challenges effectively.
TheRobsterUK
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm currently working on a costing model for water storage tanks. The type of tanks I'm looking at have a certain life expectancy but due to a limited number of installations there isn't much empirical (observed) data about how long they can actually be expected to last before needing replacement.

I have collected estimates from a number of manufacturers who have each given an expected range of life expectances. Generally these are between about 25-50 years, as shown below:

http://www.sudsolutions.com/misc/tanks.JPG

Now what I'd like to do is build some sort of Monte Carlo simulation algorithm using the data in the table above. But I am not sure how to translate that data into a frequency distribution. Does anyone know a formula that I can plug the above numbers into in order to be able to get some kind of frequency distribution? Or am I going about this the wrong way?

Any ideas appreciated. :)

Cheers
-Rob
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You might want to post this question in the math forum. It may get more responses. I guess the place I would start is just to calculate the mean and SD of each and plot a standard deviation curve for each range. I did a quick histogram and the distributions don't look normally distributed though. This is where someone well versed in stats can really help. With such a small sample to pull from, what assumptions can be made that are valid?
 
Thanks, I've reposted in the General Math forum as advised.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1313697#post1313697

With regards to assumptions, I can't really make any...this is the only data that's available so I don't have much choice other than to work with a small sample and assume that the data is reasonably accurate.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top