Initial height of a bouncing ball and energy lost

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics lab involving the relationship between the initial height of a racquetball and the energy lost during its bounces. The student observed a strong linear correlation between the initial height and the energy lost, represented by the equation E=0.379h-0.006. Participants suggest exploring the coefficient of restitution, which relates to kinetic energy and the energy after the bounce, to understand the relationship better. There is an emphasis on reviewing class materials to find relevant concepts that may connect gravitational potential energy and height. The conversation highlights the importance of conservation laws in analyzing energy transformations during the bouncing process.
tink7718
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am doing a lab in my senior physics class (IB HL Physics 3-4) and I am very confused about a relationship that I found. For my experiment I dropped a racquetball from different heights and then used video analysis to find the height of the ball on its final bounce. I used this data to calculate the initial and final gravitational potential energy and then found the difference between these value to find the energy lost during the ball's bouncing. I graphed the initial height (x) and the difference in energy (y). I had a perfectly linearly correlated graph (r value of 1) with an equation of E=0.379h-0.006. Because the equation is so correlated I feel like there must be a relationship between these two variables, but I am yet to find it.

Can anyone help with this?

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 9.02.10 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 9.02.10 AM.png
    35.7 KB · Views: 762
Physics news on Phys.org
Well your relationship is the equation of the line.
But it may help understand what you've discovered if you look up "coefficient of restitution".
 
Simon Bridge said:
Well your relationship is the equation of the line.
But it may help understand what you've discovered if you look up "coefficient of restitution".

For our labs we have to equate the equation we found for our graphs to one that we learned in class. I looked up the coefficient of restitution, but saw that it related more to kinetic energy and velocity than to potential energy and height. Does it relate to GPE as well?
 
The coefficient of restitution gives initial kinetic energy after the bounce... this will be related to the final potential energy. Hint: conservation laws.

However, the project suggests you are supposed to have learned something in class related to this.
Since I wasn't there, I don't know what you are supposed to have learned.
You should check you class material to see if anything stands out... it may be indirect.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top