Initial speed and distance from initial height problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving an entertainer juggling balls while running to catch one thrown vertically upward. The initial speed required to throw the ball was calculated to be 26.1 m/s using the equation Vf = Vi + at. For the second part of the problem, participants discussed how to determine the height of the ball when the entertainer reaches the table, emphasizing the need to account for the ball's decreasing velocity as it ascends. The correct kinematic equation to use is x(t) = vt - (1/2)at^2 + x0, which reflects the ball's retarding motion. Clarification on the appropriate time and equation was sought to accurately calculate the height.
magnifik
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An entertainer juggles balls while doing other activities. In one act, she throws a ball vertically upward, and while it is in the air, she runs to and from a table 5.60 m away at a constant speed of 2.10 m, returning just in time to catch the falling ball.


Homework Equations


Part A)
With what minimum initial speed must she throw the ball upward to accomplish this feat?

Part B)
How high above its initial position is the ball just as she reaches the table?


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for the first part and got 26.1 by Vf = Vi + at
Vf = 0
Vi = 0
a = 9.8
t = (11.20/2.10)/2 = 2.67
9.8*2.67=26.1 m/s
i don't understand how to do part B of the problem though
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi magnifik, welcome to PF.
You have calculated the initial velocity. You know the time to reach the table. Using the kinematic equation find the height.
 
i'm not exactly sure which equation I use and which time i use
 
I used
x(t) = vt + (1/2)at^2 + x0
i plugged in t = 2.67 and v = 26.1
i got 104.6 from doing this,
and I'm pretty sure that's wrong because it doesn't seem realistic

a little guidance would be nice
 
x(t) = vt + (1/2)at^2 + x0
As the ball goes up, its velocity decreases. So it is retarding. There the equation should be
x(t) = vt - (1/2)at^2 + x0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top