Initial Velocity of a Soccer Ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial velocity of a soccer ball after being kicked, using a specific equation that incorporates the mass and velocity of the kicking leg, along with the coefficient of restitution. Participants clarify that the equation indeed represents the ball's initial velocity and highlight the importance of considering static friction and elastic potential energy in the calculation. Additionally, they mention that energy lost due to the ball's elastic properties and the direction of the applied force can affect the resulting velocity. The impact of gravity on the ball's acceleration is also discussed, noting that each degree of angle affects the velocity incrementally. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate velocity calculations.
chapabird
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the initial velocity of a soccer ball ,
but I found this equation and do not understand how it came about:

[PLAIN]http://superforbrain.com/files/vBall.PNG

This is supposed to give you the velocity of the ball right after its kicked, using the mass of your leg, velocity of your leg, and the coefficient of restitution [e].

Any help appreciated!

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like a really cool equation. Yes, it would be the initial velocity of the soccer ball.
 
The variable in velocity that isn’t described is the static friction and elastic potential energy of the two masses. What Joules are lost from the elastic properties of the ball and the direction this force is impacted. If the force is directed up, the acting force would be gravity 9.8 divide by 90=each degree 0.10 m\sec^2. So each degree your ball is incrementally accelerated towards would affect the impacted velocity by 0.10m\sec^2.TM
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top