Initial Velocity: Stone Released from Balloon

AI Thread Summary
When a stone is released from a balloon moving upwards at a constant velocity, its initial velocity is equal to that of the balloon, not opposite. The confusion arises from the assumption that the stone's velocity becomes zero immediately upon release. In reality, the stone continues to move upwards with the same velocity as the balloon at the moment of release. This concept is similar to throwing an object upwards from a moving hand, where the object retains the upward velocity of the hand. Understanding this principle clarifies the dynamics of objects in motion relative to their initial conditions.
manimaran1605
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
A stone released from balloon moving upwards with some constant velocity, the initial velocity of stone is same as the velocity of balloon with opposite sign, but how? What i thought is that the instant stone is released which goes upwards with balloon, stone which is going upwards would stop (t=0) velocity (u=0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
manimaran1605 said:
A stone released from balloon moving upwards with some constant velocity, the initial velocity of stone is same as the velocity of balloon with opposite sign, but how? What i thought is that the instant stone is released which goes upwards with balloon, stone which is going upwards would stop (t=0) velocity (u=0).

So you're saying that there's NO difference between just releasing the stone from a stationary balloon that isn't moving? Think again.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
manimaran1605 said:
A stone released from balloon moving upwards with some constant velocity, the initial velocity of stone is same as the velocity of balloon with opposite sign, but how?
No, not opposite sign. Same sign.
What i thought is that the instant stone is released which goes upwards with balloon, stone which is going upwards would stop (t=0) velocity (u=0).
You're free to think whatever you want. That doesn't make it right.
 
manimaran1605 said:
What i thought is that the instant stone is released which goes upwards with balloon, stone which is going upwards would stop (t=0) velocity (u=0).

Think about that for a moment. When you throw a stone upwards, you release it from your hand while your hand is moving upwards rapidly... What happens?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top