Inner Product as a Transformation

nautolian
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be an inner product space. For v ∈ V fixed, show
that T(u) =< v, u > is a linear operator on V .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First to show it is a linear operator, you show that T(u+g)=T(u)+T(g) and T(ku)=kT(u)
So,
T(u+g)=<v, u+g>=<v,u>+<v,g>=T(u)+T(g)
Then T(ku)=<v, ku>=k<v,u>
And since both the results are in the inner product space it is a linear operator on V? However, I don't know if this is right, because can't you not split up the second value like I did? Only the first? A little clarification would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nautolian said:

Homework Statement



Let V be an inner product space. For v ∈ V fixed, show
that T(u) =< v, u > is a linear operator on V .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First to show it is a linear operator, you show that T(u+g)=T(u)+T(g) and T(ku)=kT(u)
So,
T(u+g)=<v, u+g>=<v,u>+<v,g>=T(u)+T(g)
Then T(ku)=<v, ku>=k<v,u>
And since both the results are in the inner product space it is a linear operator on V? However, I don't know if this is right, because can't you not split up the second value like I did? Only the first? A little clarification would be appreciated! Thanks!

If your inner product is over the real numbers then both are fine. If it's over the complex numbers then you'll have to say exactly how your inner product is defined.
 
By definition the inner product is bilinear,that is,linear in eahh variable while the other variable is held constant.
 
hedipaldi said:
By definition the inner product is bilinear,that is,linear in eahh variable while the other variable is held constant.

In complex spaces this is not entirely correct. If we use the *usual* definition of inner product &lt;u,v&gt; \equiv \sum_{i=1}^n \bar{u}_i v_i, where the bar denotes the complex conjugate, then
&lt;u,cv&gt; = c&lt;u,v&gt;, \text{ but } &lt;cu,v&gt; = \bar{c}&lt;u,v&gt;.
Note: this definition of inner product gives <u,u> ≥ 0 and real; the other type
(u,v) \equiv \sum_{i=1}^n u_i v_i gives (u,u) = complex number, in general.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top