Instantaneous centre of rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter person_random_normal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of the instantaneous center of rotation and its relationship with torque. It is clarified that the instantaneous axis of rotation is at rest and does not experience angular acceleration. Pseudo torque arises when the point about which torque is calculated is accelerating, particularly in scenarios involving both translation and rotation. The conversation questions how angular speed can increase without a force providing torque and the implications for the location of the instantaneous axis of rotation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately applying torque equations in rotational motion scenarios.
person_random_normal
Messages
165
Reaction score
10
Tell me- in general
It is possible that -while writing torque equation about instant centre of rotation, we may get a pseudo torque term
That is instant centre of rotation may have some angular acceleration
Am I right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shreyas Samudra said:
Tell me- in general
It is possible that -while writing torque equation about instant centre of rotation, we may get a pseudo torque term

No . Instantaneous axis of rotation means the axis is at rest . It is not accelerating .

Pseudo torque comes in picture when the point about which the torque equation is written is accelerating .
 
Last edited:
what if a bar is moving on frictionless floor (translating + rotating) and such that its angular speed is increasing ,
so instant centre is to have some angular acceleration
 
Shreyas Samudra said:
what if a bar is moving on frictionless floor (translating + rotating) and such that its angular speed is increasing ,
so instant centre is to have some angular acceleration

How is the angular speed increasing ? Which force is providing torque ? Where do you think is the location of instantaneous axis of rotation ?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top