Instantaneous poynting vector for EM radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the instantaneous Poynting vector for electromagnetic (EM) radiation, specifically addressing the behavior of the Poynting vector when the electric field (E) and magnetic field (B) are at their maximum and zero values. Participants explore the sharing of energy between E and B in a plane wave context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Poynting vector S is defined as S = E x B, but questions the instantaneous behavior of S when E and B are at their maximum versus when they are zero.
  • Another participant corrects the first by stating that the equation provided refers to the time-averaged Poynting vector, introducing the instantaneous Poynting vector formula that includes time and position dependencies.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the energy distribution between E and B, likening it to kinetic and potential energy, and seeks clarification on energy storage when both fields are zero compared to when they are maximum.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the in-phase relationship of E and B in a monochromatic plane wave, stating that energy is proportional to the square of the maximum values of E or B, and suggesting that each field contributes half the energy of the wave.
  • One participant emphasizes that energy is not 'stored' but rather moves with the wave, explaining that at points of zero fields, energy has moved ahead in the wave, and that the instantaneous energy at one location reappears at another location where the fields are at maximum.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of circular polarization as a means to clarify the discussion, noting that it consists of two linearly polarized waves that are orthogonal in space and phase-shifted in time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the instantaneous Poynting vector and the energy dynamics between E and B. There is no consensus on the interpretation of energy storage when both fields are zero versus maximum, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the instantaneous behavior of the Poynting vector and the implications of energy transfer in electromagnetic waves, with unresolved questions about the nature of energy storage and transfer in different field states.

WRGmedphys
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Have viewed PF, first time post (have searched for this question on forum):

The energy of EM radiation can be described by the Poynting vector S = E x B (insert conversion factor for cgs, MKS, etc).

For a traveling EM wave, what happens to the instantaneous value of S when E and B are max as compared to when E and B are 0?

Alternatively, how is the energy of the EM radiation shared between E and B with both E and B having maximum and zero values at the same instant of time for a plane wave?

Thank you for your input.

WRG
 
Science news on Phys.org
hi WR;
The eqn. you gave is actually the TIME AVERAGED Poynting vector.
The instantaneous Poynting vector whcih depends upon time and position, r, is given by:

S = (1/u) EB[cos^2(wt -kr)]...where w is the freqency.

Good question.
Creator
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your response Creator. Believe my confusion was considering E and B as sharing the energy of the wave (similar to K.E. and potential sharing the total E). Will dig out my undergraduate intermediate EM book and review more throughly (still confused as to where the energy is stored when E and B are both zero as compared to when E and B are both maximum).

WRG
 
WRGmedphys said:
Thank you for your response Creator. Believe my confusion was considering E and B as sharing the energy of the wave (similar to K.E. and potential sharing the total E).
No problem;
In a (monochromatic) plane wave Maxwell's equations ensure E and B are always in phase, (in vacuum).
The energy is proportional to the square of the MAX. E field OR the square of the MAX. B field, and yes, alternately it can be written as the sum of 1/2 of each field squared (with appropriate epsilon and mu factors) since each "contributes" half the energy of the wave.

(still confused as to where the energy is stored when E and B are both zero as compared to when E and B are both maximum).

The energy is not 'stored' but rather it is moved ...the energy of the waves moves with the wave. At the zero point (minimum phase) we can say the energy has moved ahead. The energy is still "stored" in the E & B field, but the fields have moved position.
Remember Poynting Vector is an energy FLUX, meaning a rate of transfer of energy.

Your worry is a common concern among those who question that the 'in phase' relation of E & B implies violation of conservation of energy.
But the question is mis-placed since even though the instantaneous energy "disappears" AT ONE LOCATION, it "reappears" simultaneously at another location, namely, 1/4 wavelength ahead in the wave (where the fields are at maximum).

Creator
 
Last edited:
Thinking about circular polarization really helps clarify this. Here there are no nodes. Circular polarization is the sum of two linerly polarized waves at right angles in space and 90 degrees apart in time.

Think of a helix instead of a sinewave.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K