Instantaneous velocity calculation from position data

AI Thread Summary
To calculate instantaneous speed from position and time data, differentiation and finite differences are key concepts. The choice of method depends on the specific sampling points and how velocity changes over time. Each suggested formula for v(t3) can be valid in different contexts, as the appropriateness varies with the data's characteristics. Understanding the relationship between derivatives and the rate of change is crucial for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the best approach will depend on the specific scenario and data provided.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,
Given position and related time data, what is the most correct way to calculate the instantaneous speed? For example, given the data (x1, t1) , (x2, t2), (x3, t3) , (x4, t4), (x5, t5), is the instantaneous speed at time t3 given more correctly by

v(t_3) = \frac{(x_4-x_2)} {(t_4-t_2)}
v(t_3) = \frac {(x3-x2) } {(t3-t2)}
v(t_3) = \frac {(x4-x3)} {(t4-t3)}

and why?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is impossible to give a general answer to your question.
 
Are you familiar with differentiation and, as a follow-on, finite differences?
 
Yes, differentiation is applicable when the position is given as a function of time. I will look into finite differences. My understanding is that there are different types of finite difference. I guess I will figure out which one is most appropriate for the calculation of the instantaneous speed. Any suggestion in the meantime?

Thanks
 
Differentiation is simply the rate of change of one variable with respect to another. It doesn't have to be position or velocity and it doesn't have to be with respect to time. In this case, you are interested in time rate of change, but derivatives are much more broadly applicable than that.

Anyway, you seem to have some sense of the relationship between derivatives and the quantity you want here. Assuming you understand that, then your next question should be about approximating derivatives when you have data at a discrete set of points in time. That is where finite differences come into play.
 
fog37 said:
I guess I will figure out which one is most appropriate for the calculation of the instantaneous speed.
My point is that you cannot say that one will be more appropriate than another. It depends on your sampling points as well as on how the velocity varies with time. I can come up with different situations where any of the given differences would be the best approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top