Inteferenxce pattern of air wedge

  • Thread starter Thread starter somecelxis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Wedge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the interference pattern in an air wedge setup, specifically at points P and Q. Participants debate why a bright fringe appears at Q despite it being blocked by a substance, while a dark fringe is observed at P, where light is not obstructed. It is clarified that shadows from opaque materials do not affect the interference pattern, which is solely determined by path differences between light rays. The presence of destructive interference at P is confirmed, even with minimal path difference, leading to the conclusion that the conditions for dark fringes are met. Understanding the principles of interference is essential for resolving these observations.
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


please refer to the question, since at the positon Q , the lighr ray is blocked by the substance , (as in the diagram) , why the bright fringe is seen at Q , In my opinion , it it should be a dark fringe.
whereas at P , the lighr ray is not blocked , so it should be bright fringe is seen at P.. But the ans is the dark fringe is seen at P . why is it so?
the ans is B .
Correct me if i am wrong. thanks!


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140906_082518[1].jpg
    IMG_20140906_082518[1].jpg
    60 KB · Views: 505
  • DSC_0089[1].jpg
    DSC_0089[1].jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
at the positon Q , the lighr ray is blocked by the substance ,
I'm quite sure that point Q is not intended to be under the shadow of the opaque material!

Q is in the air wedge but towards one end of the air wedge, P is near the other end. The photo purports to be of the interference pattern, so such shadows would not be included here anyway because a shadow is unrelated to interference pattern.

Now, your answer ...?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
NascentOxygen;4842787 said:
Why a shadow is unrelated to interference pattern.??
 
He means the shadow of the opaque material is not part of the interference pattern shown in the photo.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
He means the shadow of the opaque material is not part of the interference pattern shown in the photo.

well , can you explain why at P , the fringes is dark? This means destructive intefrence occur at P ? how do you know that destructive intefrence occur at P ?
 
somecelxis said:
well , can you explain why at P , the fringes is dark? This means destructive intefrence occur at P ? how do you know that destructive intefrence occur at P ?
In the region around P there is almost no path difference for the two rays, yet they still cancel. How can this be? What is it that is happening to one ray but not happening to the other?

I'm sure there was another thread on the air wedge just recently.

How do I know the fringe is dark at P? Because I remember that from my high school physics! :smile:
 
somecelxis said:
well , can you explain why at P , the fringes is dark? This means destructive intefrence occur at P ? how do you know that destructive intefrence occur at P ?
Well that's will be why the fringe is dark at P: destructive interference.

You know there is destructive interference at P for the same reason you know there is destructive interference anywhere. Work through the reasoning - show us how you are doing that - then we can help.
 
Back
Top