Integral - an alternative to expanding the denominator?

LikeMath
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Integral -- an alternative to expanding the denominator?

The following integral can be easily solved by expanding the denominator but I am wondering if there is a another way to solve it

\int\frac{1}{(x+1)^7-x^7-1}dx
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You could try doing integration by substitution, and then repeating it several (probably 7) times. But I'm sure you would either end up with something really ugly or encounter a problem pretty early on that stops you.
 


LikeMath said:
The following integral can be easily solved by expanding the denominator but I am wondering if there is a another way to solve it

\int\frac{1}{(x+1)^7-x^7-1}dx



Would you be so kind as to show us how this integral is "easily" solved expanding whatever? I think this is a rather

horrible integral, expanding or not, and more than finding a way to make it more or less normal I'd love to see what's your way to solve it.

Thanx

DonAntonio
 


DonAntonio said:
Would you be so kind as to show us how this integral is "easily" solved expanding whatever? I think this is a rather

horrible integral, expanding or not, and more than finding a way to make it more or less normal I'd love to see what's your way to solve it.

Thanx

DonAntonio

By the binomial theorem we get
(x+1)^7-x^7-1=7(x^6+3x^5+5x^4+3x^2+x)
now if we factorize this term we also get
x(x+1)(x^2+x+1)^2
then partial fraction completes the solution.
 


LikeMath said:
By the binomial theorem we get
(x+1)^7-x^7-1=7(x^6+3x^5+5x^4+3x^2+x)
now if we factorize this term we also get
x(x+1)(x^2+x+1)^2
then partial fraction completes the solution.


Well, yes...but for this you must first (1) know how to factorize the polynomial (a quintic, since zero is obvious), perhaps by "guessing

that -1 is a root, and (2) you must still make the partial fractions stuff, which seems far from being that easy, as \frac{1}{x(x+1)(x^2+x+1)^2}=\frac{A}{x}+\frac{B}{x+1}+\frac{Cx+D}{x^2+x+1}+\frac{Ex+F}{(x^2+x+1)^2}
A matter of taste, I guess...perhaps because I'm a theoretical mathematician I wouldn't dare call the above "easy", or perhaps I would

but I'd add immediately "annoying and long" after that.

DonAntonio
 


Yes you are right, "easy" was not appropriate.
 


Hi !
Who said "it's not easy" ?
It takes less time to compute it that to type it. :redface:
 

Attachments

  • Simple decomposition.JPG
    Simple decomposition.JPG
    25.1 KB · Views: 481


JJacquelin said:
Hi !
Who said "it's not easy" ?
It takes less time to compute it that to type it. :redface:



Really...?! Common, it's nice to show off but not with this petty things.

DonAntonio
 
Back
Top