Integral for the calculation of torque

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the integral used to calculate torque from applied torsional shear stress. The torque equation T = ∫τ⋅r⋅dA is explained as summing the contributions of infinitesimal areas, where τ represents shear stress, dA is the area, and r is the distance from the center. It emphasizes that torque is similar to force but requires consideration of distance from the center, making a simple multiplication insufficient. The integral effectively aggregates these contributions across the entire area. Overall, the explanation clarifies the derivation of the torque integral.
laurajk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I found an integral to calculate the torque from the applied torsional shear stress, and I didn't find an explanation of how this integral is deviated. Where does it come from? Could someone explain?

T = ∫τ⋅r⋅dA = ∫τ⋅2πr⋅dr,
where T is the torque and τ the shear stress.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laurajk said:
integral is deviated.
I think you mean derived.:smile: And welcome to PF.

Do you understand how force is stress times area? Torque is similar, except that you need to include the distance from center. The torque contribution of an infinitesimal area is proportional to the distance from center, so a simple multiplication does not work. The integral is summing up the contribution of each infinitesimal area times its distance from the center. That's your first equation: Tau is stress, dA is area, and r is distance from center, and the integral adds it all up over the entire area.

Hope this helps.
 
Hello!
Yes, it should be derived, of course :)
And thank you very much for your explanation, it's very helpful and I think, I got it now! :)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top