Integral of f times cosine, as period of cosine goes to zero.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a Riemann integrable function f on the interval [a,b], the limit of the integral of f multiplied by cosine as the frequency approaches infinity equals zero: lim_{λ → ∞} ∫_{a}^{b} f(x)cos(λx)dx = 0. The user successfully demonstrates this for the indicator function and attempts to generalize the proof for any Riemann integrable function. Key insights include the use of the properties of Riemann integrable functions and the oscillatory nature of the cosine function, which leads to the cancellation effect in the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrable functions
  • Knowledge of properties of integrals, specifically involving trigonometric functions
  • Familiarity with limits and their application in calculus
  • Basic skills in mathematical analysis and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Riemann integrable functions in detail
  • Learn about the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma and its implications
  • Explore the concept of bounded functions and their integrability
  • Investigate advanced techniques in oscillatory integrals and their convergence
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, calculus, and integral theory. It is especially relevant for anyone working with Riemann integrable functions and oscillatory integrals.

Hoblitz
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is as follows:

Let f be a real valued function that is Riemann integrable on [a,b]. Show that

[tex] <br /> \lim_{\lambda \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\cos(\lambda x)dx = 0<br /> [/tex].

Homework Equations


I am freely able to use the fact that the product of Riemann integrable functions is Riemann integrable, and that the integral of cosine is sine (+ constant).


The Attempt at a Solution


The first thing I tried was just to let f be the indicator function on the interval [a,b]. In that case, it wasn't so bad because then I could find [itex]\lambda > 0[/itex] so large that (for given epsilon > 0) [itex]\frac{1}{\lambda} < \frac{1}{2}\epsilon[/itex].

Then for that lambda I can find a unique integer k such that
[tex] \frac{2\pi k}{\lambda} \leq (b-a) < \frac{2\pi (k + 1)}{\lambda} [/tex].

Then
[tex] |\int_{a}^{b} \cos(\lambda x)dx| = <br /> <br /> |\int_{a}^{a + \frac{2 \pi k}{\lambda}} \cos(\lambda x) \,dx +<br /> <br /> \int_{a + \frac{2\pi k}{\lambda} }^{b} \cos(\lambda x)\,dx| <br /> <br /> = |\frac{\sin(b)}{\lambda} - \frac{\sin(a)}{\lambda}|[/tex]

Finally,
[tex] |\frac{\sin(b)}{\lambda} - \frac{\sin(a)}{\lambda}| \leq \frac{2}{\lambda} < \epsilon.[/tex]

From there on it is clear that for [itex]\lambda^{'} > \lambda > 0[/itex], we are still less than epsilon. (Find a new unique integer as above, and run through the integrals again).

I've been trying to think of a way to apply this fact to the case with general [itex]f[/itex]. What I've tried to do is trap
[tex] \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\cos(\lambda x)dx [/tex]
between plus/minus some constant times [itex]\int_{a}^{b} \cos(\lambda x)dx[/itex], where the constant might be something like the max of the absolute values of the supremum and infemum of f over the interval [a,b], but I can't get it work out (problems arise with negatives multiplying to become positive, etc...). Any hints or comments would be very helpful, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a bigger concern should be why f(x) is bounded on that interval (it doesn't have to be)
 
Indeed I can think a few unbounded functions f which are integrable on an interval [a,b], so I can see why my idea would certainly fail. I'll try looking at this from a new perspective and see what I get. What I understand to be happening is that the rapidly quickening oscillations of cosine are going to force f to "cancel itself out" in the integral, eventually bringing that sucker close to zero...

Thanks, I'll give this more thought.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K