Integral Over all Space for Charge Density - Exponential Fun

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge density from the electric field described by E = C e^{-br}/r^2 and integrating it over all space to demonstrate that the result is zero. The relevant equations include the divergence of the electric field, expressed as ∇·E = ρ/ε₀, and the use of the delta function for radial integration. The initial attempts at solving the problem yielded non-zero results, but the correct application of spherical coordinates and the delta function confirmed that the integral evaluates to zero. The final expression for charge density is ρ(r) = -bA/ε₀ e^{-br}, leading to the conclusion that the integral over all space results in zero charge density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge density
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically divergence in spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of delta functions and their properties in integration
  • Basic proficiency in electromagnetism, particularly Gauss's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetism, such as Maxwell's equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving integrals in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of electric fields and charge density calculations.

KleZMeR
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The electric field is described by E = \frac{C e^{-br}}{r^2},
find the charge density and then integrate over all-space and show it's zero.
[/B]

Homework Equations



E = \frac{C e^{-br}}{r^2} \\ \\
\nabla \cdot E = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} \\ \\
\rho(r) = Q \delta^3 (r-r_0) \\ \\[/B]
I_{AllSpace} = \int_{0}^{\infty}\:f(r,\phi,\theta) \: r^2 \: dr \: sin\theta \: d\theta \: d\phi \\ \\
\nabla = \frac{d}{dr} \hat{r} \\ \\
\int_{0}^{\infty}f(r)Q \delta^3(r-r_0)dr = f(r_0) \\ \\

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to take \nabla E = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} and used the quotient solve for \rho(r) and then integrated over all space and I do not get a zero.

With \nabla \cdot E = (\frac{-e^{-ar}}{r} \:(ra+2))
\rho(r) = (\frac{-e^{-ar}}{r} \:(ra+2)) \: \epsilon_0

and integrating over all space gives me

4\pi \int_{0}^{\infty}\rho(r) \: r^2 \: dr

and this gives me (-1 + undefined) \: \epsilon_0

my only other idea here is to use the delta function, which in the case of the radial integral does give me a zero due to the r^2 term being evaluated at zero.

E_{AllSpace} = 4\pi \int_{0}^{\infty}\rho(r) \: r^2 \: dr = 4\pi Q \int_{0}^{\infty} \delta^3(r-r_0)r^2 \:dr = 0

This second solution seems a bit short but I think it is still valid, I'm not sure if my first attempt if I made a mistake on the integral or if there is some other way of doing this? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KleZMeR said:
The electric field is described by E = \frac{C e^{-br}}{r^2},
find the charge density and then integrate over all-space and show it's zero.
What's the direction of the electric field vector? You stated it as if it's a scalar.
 
Ahh yes, it is in the \hat{r} direction.
 
OK, so I found an issue and corrected for it, I was using \nabla in cartesian coordinates, and it should have been in spherical.

My result after using spherical component for r from \nabla, I get

\rho(r)_{AllSpace} = 4\pi \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{-bA}{\epsilon_0 } e^{-br} = A

but I noticed that if I still use the delta function I get the desired answer of zero, but I think it is Q that I am trying to find? Any help is appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K