Integrals: Math & QM Definitions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definitions of integrals in mathematics and quantum mechanics (QM), exploring their differences and implications. Participants examine the mathematical underpinnings of these definitions, particularly in relation to the L2 norm of wave functions and the context of linear algebra in QM.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define the mathematical integral as the integral of a function within limits divided by the difference of the limits, while the QM definition involves the integral of the complex conjugate of the wave equation times the function times the wave equation over limits from minus to plus infinity.
  • One participant argues that the QM definition is also mathematical, relating it to the L2 norm of a wave function, suggesting that it represents a different measurement metric compared to traditional Euclidean area calculations.
  • Another participant requests a reference for understanding the L2 norm of a wave function, indicating a desire for further clarification on the topic.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of linear algebra and functional analysis in QM, noting that wave functions can be treated as vectors in Hilbert spaces.
  • There is a contention regarding the concept of the "average of a function," with some participants expressing confusion about its definition and relevance in the context of probability distributions in quantum theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions of integrals and their applications in mathematics and quantum mechanics. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the mathematical definition or the concept of an average function, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical concepts, including Lebesgue and Riemann integrals, and the properties of infinite-dimensional function spaces, which may not be fully understood by all contributors. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating mathematical definitions with physical interpretations in quantum mechanics.

random_soldier
Messages
80
Reaction score
10
Math definition:

integral of function within limits divided by difference of limits.

QM definition:

integral of complex conjugate of wave equation times function times wave equation within limits of minus to plus infinity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
random_soldier said:
Math definition:

integral of function within limits divided by difference of limits.

QM definition:

integral of complex conjugate of wave equation times function times wave equation within limits of minus to plus infinity.
Because both use different metrics. The QM definition is mathematical, too. It's the ##L_2## norm of a wave function, it's height if you will. There is no average going on here. What you called mathematical average, is the Euclidean height if a certain area is imagined as a rectangle. So the difference is simply the different ruler you use for a measurement. The Euclidean area isn't of much help for wave functions, the ##L_2## norm is. It's a bit as if you asked, why astronomers don't use miles or kilometers to measure intergalactic distances.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: random_soldier
I think I understand somewhat. Do you have a quick reference for what the L2 norm of a wave function is? I think I would get a better understanding with that.
 
random_soldier said:
I think I understand somewhat. Do you have a quick reference for what the L2 norm of a wave function is? I think I would get a better understanding with that.
Well, it's basically functional analysis and perhaps you want read it in a book (should be somewhere in the first 40 pages).
Maybe these insight article(s) is of help: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hilbert-spaces-relatives/ (2 parts).

Why especially this function norm is used is a bit excessive to explain for short. It starts with the fact, that Lebesgue integrals rather than Riemann integrals are used, that it should work for real and complex numbers, that the function space is infinite dimensional, that it should be a norm for the metric used, that functions which are almost everywhere identical to zero have to be factored out, and that we want to have a complete space, in which Cauchy sequences converge. So a lot of technical aspects are more important than a geometric area. In a way it is still an area, because we interpret it as a summation of probabilities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: random_soldier
random_soldier said:
Math definition:

integral of function within limits divided by difference of limits.

QM definition:

integral of complex conjugate of wave equation times function times wave equation within limits of minus to plus infinity.

First, you have to stop thinking like that. QM is built on an area of mathematics called Linear Algebra, which includes the theory of Hilbert Spaces and, in particular the ##L_2## space. See here:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/L2-Function.html

Note that the wave-functions in QM are analogous to vectors: and, in fact, have the same properties as vectors.

Wherever you are learning QM, it should be putting the definitions in a proper mathematical context.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: random_soldier
I see. Well, I don't know if I should go into that sort of detail. I am actually reading a text for a class, Introduction to Nuclear Physics by Kenneth S. Krane. It's not a for a QM class nor do I think it's a good source for that now that you mention all this.
 
PeroK said:
First, you have to stop thinking like that. QM is built on an area of mathematics called Linear Algebra, which includes the theory of Hilbert Spaces and, in particular the L2L2L_2 space.
Technically it is functional analysis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
I've no clue how you come to the "mathematical definition" in #1. For a given probability distribution ##W(x)## of a random variable ##X## the expectation value (or "average" by definition is given by
$$\langle X \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x x W(x).$$
This is independent of QT.

In QT, if ##X## is a position variable, the probability distribution is given via Born's rule ##W(x)=|\psi(x)|^2##.
 
vanhees71 said:
I've no clue how you come to the "mathematical definition" in #1.
From mathematics of course! That is what the average of a function is. You are considering a special case of a random variable with a distribution.
 
  • #10
I've no clue, what the "average of a function" might be either. I've never heard about such an idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K