Integrate vector in rotating frame?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of integrating velocity vectors in a rotating frame, specifically in the context of navigation equations for a vehicle on Earth. The user seeks clarity on the implications of integrating the velocity components (vn, ve, vd) when the frame is not fixed and the velocity is relative to a rotating frame. Typically, integration is straightforward when the frame is stationary, but the challenge arises due to the frame's rotation and the nature of the velocity reference. The conversation highlights a need for expert insights into this nuanced topic. Overall, the integration of these vectors in a rotating frame presents significant challenges that require further exploration.
Hare
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi.
Ok, so I'm trying to understand the "navigation equations".

n: frame traveling on Earth with vehicle.
e: frame centered in earth, rotating with it.
P: Position of vehicle center of gravity.

v^{n}_{P/e} = (vn,ve,vd): velocity of P w.r.t to e-frame, expressed in n-frame.

Normally you don't integrate this, but uses vn,ve,vd to calculate the derivative of longitude,latitude,height and then integrate these to get position in longitude,latitude,height.

BUT, my question is: what do you get if you integrate vn,ve,vd?

I mean, normally when you integrate vectors:
- the frame is fixed in space
- you have a velocity w.r.t this frame
- and you just integrate each component separately

But now
- the frame is rotating
- velocity is not w.r.t this frame

Any thoughts?

/Jonas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. My only thought is I so wish some of the cognoscenti here would comment on your questions Hare. I suspect perhaps a few are brave enough to jump into this rabbit warren with no visible bottom. Certainly not I, but some answers here might be helpful on a related subject. Anyone?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top