Integrating an inverse square to find U

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Electric Potential Energy using integration of the work equation. The integration from r_a to r_b results in the expression kQq(1/r_a - 1/r_b), which requires understanding the power rule in calculus. The anti-derivative leads to r^-1 in the numerator, and applying the definite integral yields the difference between the upper and lower limits. There is a question about whether to switch the sign due to the relationship between work and potential energy. Clarification on these calculus concepts is essential for understanding the derivation.
Imabioperson
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

This is probably going to come off as a very silly question. However, I have not had calculus in several years. I was angry that my physics textbook did not have a derivation of Electric Potential Energy. So, I finally came across it, and I see that the integration of the work equation from some point, r_a to another point, r_b yields, kQq (1/r_a - 1/r_b). Can someone explain to me where, (1/r_a - 1/r_b) is coming from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you realize it's a calculus issue. Review the power rule.
 
So, if you take the anti-derivative FIRST... we yield r^-1 in the numerator. And then, we will take the definite integral, leaving us with (1/upper limit - 1/lower limit)? And then do I switch the sign because of the relation between Work and Potential energy?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top