How Do I Integrate d³k for Particle Number Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunipa.som
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating in three dimensions for particle number calculations. The user seeks clarification on whether the integral int_d^3 k can be expressed as int_dv or requires a different formulation. It is established that v represents the volume of a sphere, with k potentially corresponding to the radial coordinate in spherical coordinates. The user aims to calculate the total number of particles, N_tot, over a specified volume, confirming the integration approach for both k and r. The integration setup for N_tot is confirmed as correct, involving the product of the integrals for k and r.
sunipa.som
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have to do integration
int_d^3 k
we know
v=(4/3)*pi*k^3
dv=4*pi*k^2 dk

can I write
int_d^3 k=int_dv=int_4*pi*k^2 dk ?
or I have to write
int_d^3 k=(1/2*pi)^3 *4*pi*k^2 dk
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid you will have to explain your notation. I assume that "int_d^3" refers to an integral in three dimensions but what is k?

v= (4/3) pi k^3 is the volume of a sphere of radius k. Is k what would normally be called \rho ("rho") in spherical coordinates?

If so then your "int_d^3 k" would be
\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi}\int_{\phi= 0}^{\pi}\int_{\rho= 0}^R \rho (\rho^2 sin(\phi) d\theta d\phi d\rho)
= 2\pi\left(\int_{\phi=0}^\pi sin(\phi)d\phi\right)\left(\int_{\rho= 0}^R \rho^3 d\rho\right)
= 2\pi \left(2\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}\rho^4\right)_0^R= \pi R^4
 
Actually I have number of particles N(r,k) as a function of r and k. r=0 to 50, k=0 to 50. I have to calculate total number of particles over whole volume.
So, i want to do integration
N_tot=int_int_N(r,k)*d^3 k*d^3 r
Now, int_d^3 k=int_4*pi*k^2 dk
int_d^3 r=int_4*pi*r^2 dr

N_tot=int_int_N(r,k)*d^3 k*d^3 r=int_int_N(r,k)*4*pi*k^2 dk*4*pi*r^2 dr

am I right?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top