Integrating Data with the Trapezoidal Rule on the HP 50g Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcio
  • Start date Start date
marcio
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Dear friends

Does the HP 50g integrate data (x,y) using numerical methods such as the trapezoidal rule?

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Look in the manual that came with it.
 
I already have. Did not help much. I have both manuals, none of them mention integration of data that I could use.
 
Alright...I have been studying... and did this, but it is not working...Could you help me out finding the problem here?

M([X; Y]) is a matrix on the stack. So, based on the trapezoidal rule, I need to compute:

sum of (Xb-Xa)*(Yb+Ya) then divide it by 2.

<< -> M
______<< M SIZE OBJ-> DROP DROP 'p'
____________<< 0 'A' STO
_________________2 p FOR i
_______________________A 'ABS((M(i,1)-M(i-1,1))*(M(i,2)+M(i-1,2)))' EVAL + 'A' STO
_________________NEXT
_________________A 2 / "Area" -> TAG
_____________>>
______>>
>>

Any help will be very much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Alright, problem solved.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top