I have the expression [tex]\int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}[/tex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I thought I had a quick way to integrate by parts but it turned out that I had accidentally evaluated [tex]\int{x\ln{x}dx}[/tex] instead.

Revisiting [tex]\int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}[/tex], I wanted to start by making a strange substitution, wherein u=ln(x), du=1/x dx, and x=e^u. This meant that when I rewrote the integral, instead of multiplying dx by a constant to get it to be du, I multiplied it by x (which in this case was e^u). Is that allowed? Because I got a very different, much uglier answer than the book's.

I'd appreciate any comments, whether on my weird "method" or on a more standard approach to evaluating [tex]\int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}[/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Integrating, probably by parts

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**