The Integration by Parts Theorem states that if f' and g' are continuous, then(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

∫f'(x)g(x)dx = f(x)g(x) - ∫f(x)g'(x)dx.

My question is, are those assumptions necessary? For example, this holds even if only one of the functions has a continuous derivative (say f' is not continuous but g' is) since in this case the right side can be differentiated using the FTC (since f*g' is continuous) and will yield f'*g, thus being an antiderivative of f'*g.

If BOTH f' and g' are discontinuous, is there an example for which this theorem does NOT work?

I tried finding one but I couldn't... Or is it still true, but much harder to prove?

A similar question arises with the substitution rule. They assume continuity of g' in the expression f(g(x))*g'(x)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Integration by parts if f' ang g' are not continuous

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**