Integration by parts SinIntegral[x]

Click For Summary
The integral ∫0t SinIntegral[x] dx can be approached using integration by parts, but it may require applying the method twice. Initially, setting u[x] = SinIntegral[x] and v'[x] = 1 simplifies the problem to tSinIntegral[t] - ∫0t Sinc[x] dx. Understanding that Sinc[x] is defined as Sin[x]/x helps clarify the integration process. The final expression can be simplified to tSinIntegral[t] - (Sin[t] - 1), leading to a more manageable solution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the Sinc function's definition for solving the integral effectively.
eclayj
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the following integral exactly (no approximations) by the method of integration by parts:

0t SinIntegral[x] dx

Homework Equations



the following hints are given:

D[SinIntegral[x], x] = Sinc[x]; and
SinIntegral[0] = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The integration by parts forrmula is ∫abu[x]v'[x]dx = u[x]v[x]|ab-∫abv[x]u'[x]dx.

The problem I have is that whether I let u[x]=1 and v'[x]= SinIntegral[x], or u[x]=SinIntegral[x] and v'[x]= 1, either way the integral on the right is more complex than what I started with (either ∫0txSinc[x]; or ∫0tSinIntegral[x].

Any help is appreciated. I hope all the programming tags work here, otherwise this will look like a mess. It may still look like a mess

So it seems to me that, although the question requires the differentiation by parts method, such method does not work because it you get more complicated integrals
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, maybe I undertstand it. Do you have to use integration by parts method twice? i.e., letting u[x] = SinIntegral[x], and v^\[Prime][x] = 1; u^\[Prime][x] = Sinc[x] ; v[x] = x
Which after applying the formula would get you to tSinIntegral[t] - ∫0tSinc[x]dx.

Then you run the integration by parts once again to find n = ∫0tSinc[x]dx.


Then the final answer will be tSinIntegral[t] - n?

This seems a little tedious, but the question specifically asks you to use the integration by parts formula, so I am guessing this must be it, unless I am missing something obvious... which is usually the case.
 
nope. Still stuck
 
Do you know what Sinc(x)․x is ?
 
Thanks Sammy. I had never encoutered the Sinc Function before. After your hint, and a little help from google, I found that Sinc[x]= (Sin[x])/x. So xSinc[x] should be Sin[x], which makes the problem much easier. I think that should have been another hint given, I'm only working in Calc II ;).
 
Is it sin int(t)*t+cos(t)-1? since D(sin int(x))=sinc(x)=sin(x)/x, u=sin int(x). If you look a int^udv=uv-int^v*du, du is on the RHS.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K