MHB Where Did I Go Wrong in Solving This Integral Using Substitution?

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was trying to solve the integral of

sin(x)*cos(x)

using the substitution method, what I did was:

u=sin(x) and that yields du/dx = cos(x) and then du=cos(x)*dx

that comes to an integral of u*du, which is easy u^2 / 2 +C. substituting back gives the final answer

sin(x)^2 / 2

But, when I ran this integral in both Maple and Mathematica, I got this answer:

-cos(x)^2 / 2

Now I tried asking Maple if the two answers are the same, but it failed. I tried checking myself, using the relation sin(x)^2+cos(x)^2=1, and got to the conclusion that they don't. I don't see what I did wrong here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically, you answer was not $\sin^{2}(x)/2$, but $\sin^{2}(x)/2+C.$ Likewise, the computer's answer was not $-\cos^{2}(x)/2$, but $-\cos^{2}(x)/2+C$. Since your two answers differ by a constant (namely, $1$), they are really the same answer from a calculus perspective.
 
Ackbach said:
Technically, you answer was not $\sin^{2}(x)/2$, but $\sin^{2}(x)/2+C.$ Likewise, the computer's answer was not $-\cos^{2}(x)/2$, but $-\cos^{2}(x)/2+C$. Since your two answers differ by a constant (namely, $1$), they are really the same answer from a calculus perspective.

Or more clearly, $C_1$ and $C_2$. This happened to me a while ago, it tends to occur a lot with trigonometric functions because of their periodic identities, so you often end up with very different looking expressions which are in fact equal.. :confused:
 
ah, I wasn't thinking about it...interesting.

well done to both of you ! thanks ! :)
 
Just to be cheeky about it:
\int sin(x)~cos(x) dx = \frac{1}{2} \int 2 sin(x)~cos(x) dx = \frac{1}{2} \int sin(2x)dx

After u = 2x:
= \int sin(x)~cos(x) dx = \frac{1}{2} \int sin(u) \cdot \frac{1}{2} du

= -\frac{1}{4} cos(u) + C = -\frac{1}{4} cos(2x) + C

and upon using cos(2x) = cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)
\int sin(x)~cos(x) dx = \frac{1}{4} \left ( sin^2(x) - cos^2(x) \right ) + C

which contains both your sin and cos terms and is also off by a constant from the other solutions. (Nerd)

-Dan
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top