Integration Intuition for work between x1 and x2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a force defined as F=bx^3, with b being 3.7 N/m^3, as it moves an object from x=0 to x=2.6 m. Participants express confusion about the integration process used to find the area under the curve of the force function, questioning the physical significance of the force's dependence on the cube of the distance. Clarifications are provided regarding the relationship between force, distance, and the concept of gradient, which is described as the rate of change in a linear context. The discussion also touches on how the constant b is determined and its units, emphasizing that it can be derived from experimental data rather than direct measurement. Overall, the conversation seeks to deepen understanding of the mathematical principles underlying work and force in physics.
Joshb60796
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A force F=bx3 acts in the x direction, where the value of b is 3.7N/m3. How much work is done by this force in moving an object from x=0.00m to x=2.6m?

Homework Equations


W=F*D
∫undu = (u(n+1)/(n+1))+C

The Attempt at a Solution


I know from previous problems that I'm going to integrate to find the area under the curve bx3 from 0 to 2.6 but I don't have the intuition as to why. I don't really understand why I'm doing this besides the face that I see a function raised to a power and not much more information is given. I'm following a pattern based on a pattern I see. I get that the force is changing in the y coordinate and that the x coordinate I'm worried about goes from 0 to 2.6 and I'm finding the area using integration but is the force a jerk because it's raised to the 3rd power, would it be acceleration if raised to the second power? I remember doing derivatives and thinking this. How did they come up with b? How did b come to be? What measuring device gives a reading like 3.7N/m3? I'm not even sure I'm asking the right questions but I want to fully understand this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Joshb60796 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I know from previous problems that I'm going to integrate to find the area under the curve bx3 from 0 to 2.6 but I don't have the intuition as to why.

If you consider a force F moving its point of application an infinitesimal distance 'dx', then the work done within in this distance is dW = F dx

For the work done over the entire distance from x2 to x1

\int_{0} ^W 1 dW = \int_{x_1} ^{x_2} F dx \Rightarrow W = \int_{x_1} ^{x_2} F dx

Graphically, this represents the area under the force-distance curve.


Joshb60796 said:
I don't really understand why I'm doing this besides the face that I see a function raised to a power and not much more information is given. I'm following a pattern based on a pattern I see. I get that the force is changing in the y coordinate and that the x coordinate I'm worried about goes from 0 to 2.6 and I'm finding the area using integration but is the force a jerk because it's raised to the 3rd power, would it be acceleration if raised to the second power? I remember doing derivatives and thinking this. How did they come up with b? How did b come to be? What measuring device gives a reading like 3.7N/m3? I'm not even sure I'm asking the right questions but I want to fully understand this.

What could happen to get such a formula is that based on measuring force with distance, you could find that F∝x3 such that F= bx3. If you plot a graph of F against x3, the gradient would be 'b'.

To get what units 'b' would have, the units of the product of 'bx3' would need to be Newtons (N); x is in m.

so N = b*m3 such that b = N/m3. So you would not always have an instrument measuring something in N/m3 but you might be able to figure it out based on other data.
 
Thank you sir for your insight. What was that symbol you used after F? I've never seen it before. Also, what is a gradient exactly? Is it like a coefficient that changes? I've only had up to Calculus 2 so far.
 
Joshb60796 said:
Thank you sir for your insight. What was that symbol you used after F? I've never seen it before. Also, what is a gradient exactly? Is it like a coefficient that changes? I've only had up to Calculus 2 so far.

The ∝ ? I am not sure why it appears so small but it is the symbol for 'directly proportional to' so as one increases, the other increases by a set amount.

Gradient refers to a rate of change. In the straight line equation y=mx+c, the gradient would be equal to m. Such that the change in the distance y (denoted by Δy) divided by the change in the distance x (Δx) is equal to m.

Δy/Δx = m

For more information on a basic method on how gradient or slope is calculated, you can read here.
 
oh ok, I didn't realize that gradient was synonymous to slope. Thank you for the explanation.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top