What shape results from integrating the area of a circle?

AI Thread Summary
Integrating the area of a circle results in the formula πr³/3, which represents the volume of a right isosceles cone with base and height both equal to r. This is derived by visualizing a circle sliding along an axis, generating the cone through circular cross-sections. The integration process for a sphere involves its surface area, 4πr², leading to the volume formula 4/3πr³ when integrated. The discussion also clarifies that the differentiation in this context is with respect to r. Overall, the integration of circular shapes leads to insights about their geometric properties and volumes.
Rob K
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am trying to understand calculus as concerns circles and I can clearly see that the integral of a circumference is an area:
\int2∏r = ∏r^{2}

but what do I get if I integrate the area, I get
∏r^{3}/3

I am confused as to what this shape would be, I kind of was expecting a sphere, but the formula for a sphere is:
4∏r3/3

plus a little technical point: when differentiating this, is it dr/dx or dy/dr, or am I totally off the mark?

Thanks in advance

Rob K
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rob K said:
Hi there,

I am trying to understand calculus as concerns circles and I can clearly see that the integral of a circumference is an area:
\int2∏r = ∏r^{2}

but what do I get if I integrate the area, I get
∏r^{3}/3

I am confused as to what this shape would be, I kind of was expecting a sphere, but the formula for a sphere is:
4∏r3/3

plus a little technical point: when differentiating this, is it dr/dx or dy/dr, or am I totally off the mark?

Thanks in advance

Rob K

The integration is with respect to r. The volume you get is a right isosceles cone with base and height both r. Here's how you can think of it. Take a circle of radius r and think of an r axis perpendicular to the circle through its center. The circle is at distance r from the origin on this axis. If you slide the circle to a larger distance its radius increases accordingly. Sliding the circle in the r direction generates the cone and the integral you are calculating represents calculating the volume of that cone by circular cross sections. And it gets the correct answer of 1/3*Area of base*height for a cone.

The connection between circumference and area of a circle by integration also works for a sphere, but the connection is between surface area and volume. The surface area is ##4\pi r^2## and if you integrate that you get the volume ##\frac 4 3 \pi r^3##. This is the calculation of the volume of a sphere by spherical shells.
 
Thank you, that is very useful as a visualization of integration. Let me get this a little clearer in my head. Is this another way to describe it. a right angle triangle with two 45˚ angles then revolved around the z axis, assuming the z axis is one of the non hypotenuse sides, as you would create it in 3d modelling?
 
Rob K said:
Thank you, that is very useful as a visualization of integration. Let me get this a little clearer in my head. Is this another way to describe it. a right angle triangle with two 45˚ angles then revolved around the z axis, assuming the z axis is one of the non hypotenuse sides, as you would create it in 3d modelling?

Yes, that also describes a right isosceles cone. Both legs of the triangle have length r.
 
The area of the surface of a sphere is 4πr2. Integrate that to get the volume of a sphere.
 
Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top