Integration & Trig: Get Help Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter alamin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integration techniques for the functions 1/sqrt(1-x^5) and 1/(1+x^4), emphasizing the use of partial fractions after factoring polynomials into linear or quadratic terms. It highlights the need to find complex roots for 1-x^5, specifically the fifth roots of unity, which are equally spaced on the unit circle in the complex plane. The integration of 1/sqrt(1-x^5) leads to hypergeometric functions, indicating a complex solution approach. Additionally, the trigonometrical identity involving sides of a triangle is clarified to apply to a general triangle, with a, b, and c representing the lengths opposite angles A, B, and C. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding both polynomial factorization and trigonometric relationships in solving these problems.
alamin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Need help in integration and trig
How do you integrate
1. 1/(1-x^5)
2. 1/(1+x^4)

and the trig question.
Show that

(a^2 - b^2)/c^2 = sin(A-B)/sin(A+B)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Every polynomial, such as 1- x5 and 1+ x4 can be factored, using real numbers, into a product of linear or quadratic terms.
To factor 1- x5, find all complex roots to x5= 1. One is, of course 1 the others are complex conjugates which can be paired to give two quadratic factors. Then use "partial fractions".
Same for 1/(1+x4).

In the trig question, are we to assum that a, b, and c are lengths of sides opposite angles A, B, C? In a right triangle or general triangle?
 
general triangle!
a,b,c are length's
A,B,C are opposite angles

Sorry but i made a mistake in the first integration question
its suppose to be 1/sqrt(1-x^5)

When i used this integration in mathematica 5 : i got something like hypergeometric2f1...

Can u help me out!
 
The 5 "fifth roots of unity" lie on a circle, in the complex plane of radius 1, equally spaced around the circle. The angle between them is 360/5= 72 degrees so they are;
1, cos(72)+ i sin(72), cos(144)+ i sin(144), cos(216)+ i sin(216), cos(288)+ i sin(288).

Since cos(72)= cos(288), sin(72)= -sin(288), cos(144)= cos(216), and sin(144)= sin(216), these are in pairs of complex conjugates (as they have to be in order to satisfy and equation with real coefficients.

The solutions to x5= 1 are: 1, cos(72)+ i sin(72), cos(72)- i sin(72), cos(144)+ i sin(144), cos(144)- i sin(144) and so
1- x= -(x-1)(x- cos(72)+ i sin(72))(x- 72- i sin(72))(x- cos(144)+ isin(144))(x- cos(144)- i sin(144))= -(x-1)((x-cos(72))2+ sin2(72))((x-cos(144)2+ sin2(144))

= -(x-1)(x2- 2cos(72)+ 1)(x2-2cos(144)+ 1).

Once you have that factorization you can expand 1/(1- x5) in partial fractions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top