Intenal energy increase in wind of star ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around whether the total energy of a star increases when it emits wind, forming shock waves and bubbles. Participants explore the definition of total energy, which includes thermal and kinetic components, and consider the mechanical energy produced by the star. It is suggested that the total energy may decrease due to the nature of the equations governing thermal and kinetic energy. However, some results appear to contradict this conclusion, prompting further inquiry into the sources of energy driving the star's surface activity. The conversation highlights the complexity of energy dynamics in stellar environments.
sam_021
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a big star gives of wind , forming shock and then a bubble .. And then this bubble is driven by pressure
Also as the bubble expands the surrounding mass gets added to it
Does it make sense for the Total energy to increase ?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sam_021 said:

Homework Statement


If a big star gives of wind , forming shock and then a bubble .. And then this bubble is driven by pressure
Also as the bubble expands the surrounding mass gets added to it
Does it make sense for the Total energy to increase ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


What are your thoughts? How do you define Total Energy? What source of energy is driving the surface activity on a star?
 
berkeman said:
What are your thoughts? How do you define Total Energy? What source of energy is driving the surface activity on a star?
total energy = thermal + Kinetic

Star gives off mechanical energy, then forming shocks which inturn heats up the surrounding, thus driving the shock via pressure

I would say that the total energy decreases ?
Just from simply looking at the equations Thermal=3/2PV and Ek=0.5mv^2

but I have results that contradict that :(
 
anyone ?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top