Intensity: 4∏D2 vs. ∏r2 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter davev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the use of the formula 4∏D2 for intensity, emphasizing that it accounts for the surface area of a sphere, while ∏r2 only represents the area of a circle. Participants acknowledge the misunderstanding and express appreciation for the explanation. The distinction between the two formulas is crucial for understanding how intensity disperses in three-dimensional space. This highlights the importance of using the correct formula based on the geometric context. Understanding these differences is essential for accurate calculations in physics and related fields.
davev
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
wPoxmW6.png


Can someone please explain why the are used is 4∏D2? Shouldn't it just be ∏r2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The intensity spreads out over the surface of a sphere. Your formula is for the area of a circle.
 
sandy.bridge said:
The intensity spreads out over the surface of a sphere. Your formula is for the area of a circle.

That makes much more sense! Can't believe I totally missed that. Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top