Intensity and the Double Slit Experiment.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the intensity formula for interfering waves, highlighting the combination of electric field components from two slits. It points out that if two in-phase waves of equal magnitude combine, the resulting intensity would be four times that of a single wave, raising concerns about energy conservation. The argument emphasizes that measuring energy flow from two separate light sources should yield only double the energy, not quadruple. There is confusion regarding the "union" of fields and its applicability in different scenarios, particularly when all waves are in phase, leading to constructive interference. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of wave interference and energy conservation principles.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
In viewing a derivation of the formula describing the intensity of the interfering waves, I noticed how the electric field components were combined - one from slit a, the other from slit b. The intensity is then proportional to the square of this value. But this would mean that two in phase waves of equal magnitude would result in 4 times the intensity of one alone. However, if you had two light sources of intensity I separate from one another and measured the energy per unit of time transferred to A area, shouldn't you only get twice the energy flow when then combining the two sources? Otherwise it seems energy is not conserved. In another way put: E^2 + E^2 ≠(E + E)^2 at which the first case in the derivation uses the latter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're overlooking that elsewhere the waves are canceling. When you calculate the total energy it comes out right.
 
Yes, I believe I understand this. I guess what confuses me is the "union" of fields. It does't seem as if this thinking could be used under any situation. For example when all waves from two sources are in phase (not speaking as in a double split experiment.) Then all waves would be constructive.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top