Intensity and the Double Slit Experiment.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the intensity of interfering waves in the context of the Double Slit Experiment. It highlights that the intensity is proportional to the square of the combined electric field components from two slits, leading to the conclusion that two in-phase waves of equal magnitude yield four times the intensity of a single wave. The participant raises a critical point regarding energy conservation, questioning why combining two light sources results in a different energy flow than expected. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding wave interference and the conditions under which energy conservation holds true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference principles
  • Familiarity with the Double Slit Experiment
  • Knowledge of electric field components and their interactions
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of intensity in wave interference
  • Explore the concept of constructive and destructive interference in detail
  • Investigate energy conservation in wave mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of phase relationships in wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of wave interference and the Double Slit Experiment will benefit from this discussion.

Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
In viewing a derivation of the formula describing the intensity of the interfering waves, I noticed how the electric field components were combined - one from slit a, the other from slit b. The intensity is then proportional to the square of this value. But this would mean that two in phase waves of equal magnitude would result in 4 times the intensity of one alone. However, if you had two light sources of intensity I separate from one another and measured the energy per unit of time transferred to A area, shouldn't you only get twice the energy flow when then combining the two sources? Otherwise it seems energy is not conserved. In another way put: E^2 + E^2 ≠(E + E)^2 at which the first case in the derivation uses the latter.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You're overlooking that elsewhere the waves are canceling. When you calculate the total energy it comes out right.
 
Yes, I believe I understand this. I guess what confuses me is the "union" of fields. It does't seem as if this thinking could be used under any situation. For example when all waves from two sources are in phase (not speaking as in a double split experiment.) Then all waves would be constructive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K