Interest Formula for Varying Time Units and Compoundings?

member 508213
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Austin said:
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?
No, I believe that r and k and t could be defined in terms of some different time interval, but I have only ever seen this formula used when the basic time interval is the year. The units of r are typically in terms of the interest in a year, k is usually the number of interest computing periods per year, and t is the number of years.
 
Austin said:
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?

No, t is the time in time units (whatever that is) and k is the number of compoundings per time unit. Changing time units is common in applications, but you also need to change the interest rate to match the time unit.

Example: consider the problem of depositing $25 in Jan, Apr and Jul. Then $50 in Oct, Jan and Apr. Then $75 in Jul, Oct, Jan, and so on. Keep this pattern for 12 years. Suppose compounding is quarterly. The best way to tackle the problem is to change the time unit into 9 months and three compoundings per time unit.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top