Interesting Particle Accelerator

Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hello All,

I was doing some research on different particle accelerator designs when I came across this interesting patent here:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=FkYxAAAAEBAJ&dq=3935503

They claim in the patent that the device, using a rotating magnetic field, has the capability of pulling both positive ions and electrons around the toroid in the same direction.

But what I wanted to ask you guys is if the same concept mentioned in this patent can be used to accelerate free electrons in a conductive metal like copper? Or would this work only for a plasma?

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jdo300 said:
But what I wanted to ask you guys is if the same concept mentioned in this patent can be used to accelerate free electrons in a conductive metal like copper? Or would this work only for a plasma?

Thanks,
Jason O

Er.. no, simply because "free electrons" in a metals like copper aren't free. Even if you use the simplest Drude model, electrons in the "free electron gas" have a mean free path. If you include a more realistic model beyond the Drude model, then you have to include electron-electron scattering, electron-phonon scattering, and electron-impurity scattering.

Zz.
 
Hmmm, interesting. So, taking all these effects into account, does this mean that the rotating field would have absolutely no net effect on the free electrons or just that they would not be able to accelerate in the same way as electrons in a plasma?

If They could be moved or collectively agitated in one direction, that would be enough to cause heating in the wire I would think? Or maybe a small current flow (since normal electric currents only have net electrons drift velocities of mm/s from what little I know about the subject).

- Jason O
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top