Interesting problem from a Putnam student

  • Thread starter Thread starter philosophking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Student
philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
I'm taking the Putnam next fall, and decided to pick up a copy of Larson's problem solving book for practice. I'm having trouble, though, with one of the problems. It goes as follows.

A well known theorem states that for a prime p>2, p=x^2+y^2 iff p is one more than a multiple of 4.

Show: every prime one more than a multiple of 8 can be written in the form x^2 + 16y^2

:every prime five more than a multiple of 8 can be written in the form (2x+y)^2 + 4y^2

In all of these, x,y are integers. I think what might be confusing me is that I haven't taken a number theory course yet, so I don't know too much about mods. But if anyone can post solutions for these (as step-by-step as you can get please!) that would be very much appreciated.

Thanks again.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd prefer you to think it up yourself: the two kinds of prime you're asked to consider are of the form given in the questio. consider whether you can deduce anything about the decomposition there, such as if anything is divisible by 2,4, or so on.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top