Black Holes & Universes: Theory & Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter kjknohw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the theory that black holes may reproduce universes, potentially creating conditions conducive to life. Merging black holes result in a larger black hole and significant gravitational radiation. The feasibility of intelligent life creating tiny black holes in particle accelerators to spawn life-supporting universes remains unverified and speculative. Current measurements suggest the universe does not possess net angular momentum, despite most black holes having it. The conversation references Cosmic Natural Selection and anticipates significant discoveries from the LHC at CERN.
kjknohw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is a theroy that universes "reporduce" through black holes, and that part of the criteria that requires this also by coinsidence produces conditions that make life possable.

Discussion questions: What happens if two black holes merge?
If intellegent life creats many tiny black holes in particle accelorators, than universes would evolve to support life, is that probable?
Does the universe have net angular momentum, most black holes do?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
kjknohw said:
Discussion questions: What happens if two black holes merge?

You get a bigger black hole and a lot of gravitational radiation.


If intellegent life creats many tiny black holes in particle accelorators, than universes would evolve to support life, is that probable?

Until we can verify that such things even exist and that black holes actually do spawn new universes, that question is unanswerable.


Does the universe have net angular momentum, most black holes do?

As best we can measure right now, it doesn't.
 
The theory you are referring to is known as Cosmic Natural Selection and is most notably associated with professor Smolin, whose more mainstream work concerns loop quantum gravity.
 
Even if u manage to create artificially a micro mass black hole using accelerators in the future, u won't notice its pico second presence before it evaporates..
With the LHC(CERN) slated to be in place in 2007, ull witness some of the most interesting particle discoveries ever! and confirmation of super-symmetry theory would be one of them..
 
SpaceTiger said:
As best we can measure right now, it doesn't.
Unless what we call gravity is "really" angular momentum.
 
Some 8 years ago I posted some experiments using 2 Software Defined Radios slaved to a common clock. The idea was measure small thermal noise by making correlation measurements between the IQ samples from each radio. This is a project that has kinda smoldered in the background where I've made progress in fits and starts. Since most (all?) RA signals are small thermal signals it seemed like the technique should be a natural approach. A recent thread discussing the feasibility of using SDRs to...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads