Interference/diffraction pattern formed by 2 slits

  • Thread starter Thread starter uwbadger17
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the interference and diffraction pattern created by two slits for light with a wavelength of 600 nm, positioned 2.0 m from a wall. Key equations include d sin(theta) = mλ and a sin(theta) = mλ, with the ratio of slit separation to width given as d/a = 5. The user has identified that the dark spot is located 0.0045 m from the center point and seeks assistance in solving for theta. The conversation highlights the importance of visual aids in understanding the problem, as one participant notes the challenge of not having access to the referenced figure. The thread emphasizes the application of mathematical relationships in determining the parameters of the interference pattern.
uwbadger17
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



interference/diffraction pattern formed by two slits for light with λ=600nm on a wall L=2.0m from the slits. find a (width) and d (separtation of slits.

Homework Equations



looking at the figure given d/a=5
dsin(theta)=mλ
asin(theta)=mλ

The Attempt at a Solution



so dsin(theta)=5(lambda) and asin(theta)=1λ
also looking at the figure the dark spot appears .0045m from the center point.
How do I solve for theta?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
uwbadger17 said:

Homework Statement



interference/diffraction pattern formed by two slits for light with λ=600nm on a wall L=2.0m from the slits. find a (width) and d (separtation of slits.

Homework Equations



looking at the figure given d/a=5
dsin(theta)=mλ
asin(theta)=mλ

The Attempt at a Solution



so dsin(theta)=5(lambda) and asin(theta)=1λ
also looking at the figure the dark spot appears .0045m from the center point.
How do I solve for theta?

Unfortunately we don't have the luxury of being able to "look at the figure given".
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Relationship of slit, wavelength, and intensity
Replies
5
Views
4K
HW Question regarding double-slit interference
Replies
8
Views
2K
Fraunhofer Diffraction Pattern Ratio of Power Densities
Replies
34
Views
3K
Interference vs. diffraction patterns
Replies
2
Views
2K
Maximum frequency if there is to be one diffraction order
Replies
4
Views
2K
Double slits and convex lens interference
Replies
8
Views
2K
What is the missing variable in the double slit interference pattern?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Three slit minima and maxima and path differences
Replies
2
Views
2K
Interference/Diffraction formulas
Replies
8
Views
5K
How Many Bright Spots Are Visible When Laser Shines Through Slits?
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top