Interference Pattern: Find # Bright Fringes w/483nm Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomrja
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of bright interference fringes produced by two slits illuminated with 483 nm light, with specific dimensions for the slits and their separation. Participants emphasize understanding which equations apply to the scenario, particularly distinguishing between those for constructive and destructive interference. There is a suggestion to refine the approach to the problem by considering the experimental setup and what measurements would be taken on the screen. Clarification on the application of each equation is sought to accurately determine the number of bright fringes within the central diffraction maximum. Overall, a deeper understanding of the interference patterns and relevant formulas is essential for solving the problem effectively.
tomrja
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two slits are illuminated with 483 nm light. If the slits are separated by 0.84 mm and each have a width of 0.07 mm, about how many bright interference fringes will be seen in the region of the central diffraction maximum?

Homework Equations



2nd = (m + 1/2)\lambda
a sin(theta) = m\lambda
ybright = (m lambda L)/d

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think that the first equation applies to this problem, but I put it in there anyway just in case. The other formula is labeled as the destructive interference. I don't exactly know what formula to use or what to solve for. Any advice is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if you understood to what situations each equation applies and what it tells you. Then you'll know if each would apply to the described set-up. In other words, you need to refine your thinking a bit more than "this problem involves interference" and "this equation was on a page in the book talking about interference."

Also, what do you think is going on in the problem? In other words, if you set this experiment up, what would you think will be on the screen? What would you measure on the screen to answer the question posed?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top