Interference terms in particle spin

deneve
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
In the double slit experiment there are interference terms which are responsible for the way in which particles appear on a screen (diffraction pattern). The density matrix for an electron with spin |+X> going into a stern Gerlach alligned in the z direction also has off diagonal terms which idicate interference.

Is it correct to think that these interference terms are responsible for the fact that some electrons end up going up and others down just as particles go above and below a datum line which extends from the middle of the double slits to the screen?

Many thanks for any replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the interference terms are not responsible for the way in which electrons end up going up or down in the Stern-Gerlach experiment. In the Stern-Gerlach experiment, the spin of the electron interacts with a magnetic field, causing it to be deflected either up or down, depending on its spin. This is a result of the interaction between the electron's magnetic moment and the external magnetic field, and is not related to interference.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top