Interiors of sets in topological vector spaces

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
In Rudin's book Functional Analysis, he makes the following claim about the interior A^\circ of a subset A of a topological vector space X: If 0 < |\alpha| \leq 1 for \alpha \in \mathbb C, it follows that

<br /> \alpha A^\circ = (\alpha A)^\circ,<br />

since scalar multiplicaiton (the mapping f_\alpha: X \to X given by f_\alpha(x) = \alpha x) is a homeomorphism; that is, a 1-to-1 continuous mapping.

This is the first time I've ever confronted the term "homeomorphism," and I have no idea how I can deduce the above observation about interiors given this hypothesis. Can someone help? (This is not a HW problem; it's a point in our notes that is confusing me.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You haven't seen the definition of homeomorphism? Its the topological version of 'isomorphism': an invertible continuous function with continuous inverse; this must be in Rudin also. Note: you say "a 1-to-1 continuous mapping", this is wrong. I hope by 1-1 you mean 'bijective' (I find this a confusing term, I have seen people use it for 'injective'), but the inverse is also required to be continuous!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top