Interpolation of pressure from one mesh to another mesh

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the accuracy of pressure interpolation between two different mesh types, tetrahedral and brick elements. Key suggestions for checks include integrating pressure over the domain, interpolating random points from both meshes, and comparing results to ensure consistency. The user seeks clarification on integrating pressure and whether it involves summing pressures at each node of the elements. Additionally, a detailed method is proposed to calculate total forces on element faces before and after interpolation to assess the quality of the interpolation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of thorough validation in mesh interpolation processes.
kajalschopra
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have performed interpoaltion of applied pressure from one mesh (mesh of tetra elements) to another mesh (mesh of brick elements).

I have done the interpolation.

I want to introduce some checks if my interpoaltion is rightly done..

Please can anyone advise what could be the checks that may be acrried out?

Please help..

Kajal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some ideas:
Integrate the pressure over the domain.
Interpolate some random points from both meshes and see if you get the same results.
Interpolate back to the original mesh to see if you get something remotely similar.
 
I did not get you here;

1) You say integrate pressure over the domain

Whay you mean exactly heer? does it mean that I should add the pressure on each of the nodes of each eleemnt?

Total pressure over the whole domain = Sum of pressures on every mode of every eleemnt?

Please can you eleaborate?

2) You said: Interpolate some random points from both meshes and see if you get the same results.

Is this continuation of 1)

Please he;lp
 
Also, I was thinking of:

1) Get the total pressure acting on every element face before interpolation (i.e on on elements of source mesh)- I can do this as I have some intrinsic functions available in the utility I'm using...

2) Get force on every element of 1 = total pressure * area of eleement face

3) Get total force summing up forces on every element face

1,2,3 were with the source mesh

Now, 4,5,6 on destination mesh

4) Get the total pressure acting on every element after interpolation (i.e on on elements of destination mesh)- agan using intrinsic functions available in the utility I'm using...

5) Get force on every element of 4 = total pressure * area of eleement face

6) Get total force summing up forces on every element face

Compare 3 and 6 which would give an ided of quality of interpolation done.

Please advise
 
1) Yes. Your second post explains it.

2) If the procedure you describe in the second post is expensive then you can just pick a few points in the domain and see whether the values on the two meshes agree. If you're doing the interpolation just once or you want to check your algorithm then the whole procedure is worth doing.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top