Interpret Probability Distribution: Discrete Probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter hoffmann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete
hoffmann
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
how do i interpret this probability distribution:

\sum_{k=r}^\infty \binom{k}{r}p^k(1-p)^{k-r}

where r is the number of successes, p is the probability, k trials.

by looking at it, it seems like it's similar to a negative binomial distribution once you pull out a k/r. if you do some math after pulling out the k/r, it seems like it is the expected value of a geometric distribution. is this distribution saying that a negative binomial divided by the number of successes r means there is only one success, which is geometric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in other words, what does this sum equal?
 
hoffmann said:
how do i interpret this probability distribution ... it seems like it's similar to a negative binomial distribution once you pull out a k/r

Do you mean to ask "what is a probabilistic interpretation of this summation formula?" - in which case there would be lots of different ways to write it as an expected value E[f(X)] = sum(f(k)*Prob[X=k]). One way you found was with negative binomial X and f(X)=X/r; the other way was E[g(Y)] for some function g where Y is geometric.

However it sounds like you want to use E[f(X)]=E[g(Y)] to draw conclusions about how X and Y are related, but that's just not possible.

Does that help?
 
makes sense. thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top